Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR300 was manufactured 20 months before the WG-4 GPS making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR300 grades against the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR300 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-ZR300
WG-4 GPS | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2012 | More modern by 20 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
EX-ZR300 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 features outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The picture underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you will want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 240 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $329 | $210 |