Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Samsung GX-1S front
Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced May 2012
Samsung GX-1S
(Full Review)
  • 6MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF Mount
  • 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
  • Launched January 2006
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung GX-1S, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-ZR300 was announced 6 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the GX-1S with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung GX-1S

 EX-ZR300 GX-1S 
LaunchedMay 2012January 2006Newer by 78 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution461k210kCrisper display (+251k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Casio EX-ZR300

 GX-1S EX-ZR300 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung GX-1S

 EX-ZR300 GX-1S 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison

For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung GX-1S in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the GX-1S.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and GX-1S is 92 and 68 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and GX-1S.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR300 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR300 will provide greater detail with its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography features
Samsung GX-1S Portrait photography features
39
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
50
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution sensor (6MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Street photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
60
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than others in class (605 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung GX-1S as a Sports photography camera
55
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery (500 per charge)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
38
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (6MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography factors
Samsung GX-1S Travel photography factors
71
good battery (500 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
52
lighter than others in class (605 grams)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (6MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography factors
Samsung GX-1S Landscape photography factors
52
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good battery (500 per charge)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
46
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Pentax KAF mount)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (6MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging factors
Samsung GX-1S Vlogging factors
33
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no external mic socket
9
no video shooting
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung GX-1S
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Samsung GX-1S
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Samsung GX-1S
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2012-05-22 2006-01-16
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 6MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3008 x 2008
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 11
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Pentax KAF
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 151
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 210 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Min shutter speed 15 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 pounds) 605g (1.33 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC card
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $329 $850