Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
62
Features
62
Overall
62

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched May 2012
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Introduced May 2014
  • Earlier Model is Samsung NX2000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung NX3000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-ZR300 was introduced 24 months before the NX3000 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the NX3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung NX3000

 EX-ZR300 NX3000 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-ZR300

 NX3000 EX-ZR300 
IntroducedMay 2014May 2012More recent by 24 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung NX3000

 EX-ZR300 NX3000 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution461k461kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 features exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX3000 has measurements of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung NX3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the NX3000.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and NX3000 is 92 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and NX3000.

To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR300 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX3000 will offer greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography info
Samsung NX3000 Portrait photography info
39
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
77
manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography details
Samsung NX3000 Street photography details
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
81
screen tilts
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (230g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Sports photography camera
55
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 shots)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
56
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Samsung NX3000
71
better than average battery power (500 shots)
lighter than average (205 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
68
lighter than competition in class (230 grams)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Landscape photography camera
52
focusing manually
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
72
manual focus
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging features
Samsung NX3000 Vlogging features
33
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
34
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (230g)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung NX3000
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Samsung NX3000
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Samsung NX3000
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2012-05-22 2014-05-26
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 35
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 461 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lb) 230 grams (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 370 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 B740
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $329 $897