Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 20mm
- Released January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung PL210, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the PL210 (14MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 17 months after the PL210 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung PL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR300 grades vs the PL210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung PL210. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung PL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung PL210
| EX-ZR300 | PL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL210 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| PL210 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung PL210
| EX-ZR300 | PL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 has outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL210 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung PL210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the PL210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and PL210 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and PL210.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung PL210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung PL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung PL210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $329 | $200 |