Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is pretty close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was launched 17 months later than the SH100 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the SH100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung SH100. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung SH100
| EX-ZR300 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SH100 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung SH100
| EX-ZR300 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung SH100 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the SH100.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and SH100 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and SH100.
All in all, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR300 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SH100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $329 | $200 |