Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was brought out 3 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the SL102 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 41 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SL102 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung SL102
| EX-ZR300 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and SL102 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and SL102.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also called as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $130 |
