Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR300 was released 17 months after the ST30 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the ST30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung ST30. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung ST30
| EX-ZR300 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| ST30 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST30
| EX-ZR300 | ST30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 features exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST30 has specifications of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the ST30.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and ST30 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and ST30.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR300 due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Casio EX-ZR300 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 87 gr (0.19 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $329 | $55 |
