Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e75f/3e75f97ec72a6b6432f81acd12a383eebb151e04" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/def47/def47a2023687ecd84a06baf561fc4c721f1f3c3" alt="Samsung ST30 front Samsung ST30 front"
98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-ZR300 was released 17 months after the ST30 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the ST30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung ST30. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung ST30
EX-ZR300 | ST30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Casio EX-ZR300
ST30 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST30
EX-ZR300 | ST30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 features exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST30 has specifications of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the ST30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be575/be57590bfe384e48aaf557a707b247e00e0c84f6" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 size comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and ST30 is 92 and 98 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2f26/d2f260639542a4c39d30cad9eadbe223058b2a8e" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and ST30.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR300 due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Casio EX-ZR300 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/535de/535de29824338fb508973c5d58c76c9674cce294" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a39ff/a39ff8e9e842cad2abf64cd939cb22df3ee77497" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST30 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 87 gr (0.19 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $329 | $55 |