Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


99 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview
Following is a complete overview of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST6500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the ST6500 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR300 was unveiled 17 months after the ST6500 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR300 matches up versus the ST6500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST6500. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung ST6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung ST6500
EX-ZR300 | ST6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Casio EX-ZR300
ST6500 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST6500
EX-ZR300 | ST6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST6500 has proportions of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST6500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the ST6500.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and ST6500 is 92 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and ST6500.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of photos although you will want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-ZR300 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST6500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $329 | - |