Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2009
- Other Name is ST550
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung TL225, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 2 years later than the TL225 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung TL225
EX-ZR300 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | August 2009 | Fresher by 34 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR300
TL225 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 461k | Clearer display (+691k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL225
EX-ZR300 | TL225 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the TL225.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and TL225 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and TL225.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to deliver extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL225 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL225 |
Alternate name | - | ST550 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2009-08-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 187 grams (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $329 | $488 |