Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is ST5000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was released 2 years later than the TL240 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the TL240 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung TL240
| EX-ZR300 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 29 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| TL240 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL240
| EX-ZR300 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 features physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the TL240.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and TL240 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and TL240.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called as | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $171 |