Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is ST5000
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung TL240, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR300 was released 2 years later than the TL240 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the TL240 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung TL240
EX-ZR300 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2012 | January 2010 | Fresher by 29 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-ZR300
TL240 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL240
EX-ZR300 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 features physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung TL240 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the TL240.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and TL240 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through technical specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and TL240.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called as | - | ST5000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $329 | $171 |