Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was launched 3 years after the TL320 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the TL320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung TL320
EX-ZR300 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | February 2009 | More modern by 40 months | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Casio EX-ZR300
TL320 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL320
EX-ZR300 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung TL320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the TL320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at specs. The image below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and TL320.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | - |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $329 | $380 |