Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR300 was launched 11 months later than the WB210 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR300 grades against the WB210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR300 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| WB210 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR300 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and WB210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and WB210.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to give more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Portrait photography with Samsung WB210
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
you can focus manually
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Street photography with Samsung WB210
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus by touch
lighter than average in class (174 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB210 Sports photography factors
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 per charge)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB210 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average in class (174 grams)
includes focus by touch
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography details
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery power (500 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
big screen (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging details
Samsung WB210 Vlogging details
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic socket
pretty wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (174g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $279 |