Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR300 was released 19 months before the WB35F making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up versus the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-ZR300 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-ZR300
| WB35F | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-ZR300 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the WB35F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and WB35F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you can expect comparable quality of images though you need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Street photography with Samsung WB35F
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (205g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography info
Samsung WB35F Sports photography info
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (500 shots)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average (194g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB35F Landscape photography information
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
better than average battery life (500 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB35F Vlogging highlights
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (205 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (194 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $130 |
