Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 19 months prior to the WB50F making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the WB50F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZR300 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-ZR300
| WB50F | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | May 2012 | More recent by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB50F
| EX-ZR300 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the WB50F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through specifications. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and WB50F.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you should always take the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR300 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography advice
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography features
Samsung WB50F Sports photography features
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
good battery life (500 shots)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
good battery life (500 shots)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Landscape photography with Samsung WB50F
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
good battery life (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging info
Samsung WB50F Vlogging info
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone socket
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (207 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 207 grams (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $180 |