Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
Samsung WB850F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was brought out 5 months after the WB850F so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR300 scores against the WB850F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB850F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung WB850F
| EX-ZR300 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-ZR300
| WB850F | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Crisper display (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung WB850F
| EX-ZR300 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2012 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 features physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the WB850F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and WB850F is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and WB850F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you should always consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB850F as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography advice
Samsung WB850F Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (250 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB850F as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
features tracking focus
good battery power (500 shots)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography details
Samsung WB850F Travel photography details
good battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
good MP (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (250g)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB850F Landscape photography info
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
good battery power (500 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
you can focus manually
decently wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR300
Vlogging with Samsung WB850F
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone socket
decently wide (23mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (250 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
missing mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung WB850F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 250 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $599 |