Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-ZR300 was introduced 21 months before the DP2 Quattro making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-ZR300 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-ZR300
DP2 Quattro | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2012 | More recent by 21 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-ZR300 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR300 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give you greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-05-22 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 395 gr (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $329 | $931 |