Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
77 Imaging
55 Features
43 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced September 2010
- Newer Model is Sigma SD1 Merrill
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the SD1 (15MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and SD1 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was launched 21 months after the SD1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the SD1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Sigma SD1. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Sigma SD1
| EX-ZR300 | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 21 months |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SD1 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sigma SD1
| EX-ZR300 | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 has dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the SD1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and SD1 is 92 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and SD1.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR300 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-ZR300 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma SD1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sigma SD1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sigma SD1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2010-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross focus points | - | 2 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 15s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $329 | $2,339 |