Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma Quattro H

Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma Quattro H, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) posses totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR300 was brought out 4 years before the Quattro H which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the Quattro H with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the Quattro H.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and Quattro H is 92 and 78 respectively.

Often, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and Quattro H.

To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR300 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will render extra detail having its extra 29MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.