Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
67 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 7 months before the H200 which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Sony H200
| EX-ZR300 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| H200 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | May 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Sony H200
| EX-ZR300 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony H200 has sizing of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the H200.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and H200 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and H200.
All in all, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Sony H200 to show more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR300 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 530 gr (1.17 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $329 | $250 |