Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffbde/ffbdefa3dbaa016a21238d3a965f28734e1b3ffe" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b5a1/3b5a14ce54a2ad60b75d3d81e4794c486a2f61b4" alt="FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR front FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix F305EXR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and F300EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and F300EXR (1/2") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The EX-ZR400 was manufactured 2 years after the F300EXR which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR400 grades against the F300EXR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
EX-ZR400 | F300EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Casio EX-ZR400
F300EXR | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm F300EXR
EX-ZR400 | F300EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the FujiFilm F300EXR has proportions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the F300EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd7f3/bd7f3db2c2ae5e4b4141765fcd81cc98f1d85a5b" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and F300EXR is 92 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f7b2/4f7b28eebaffb28bd62c776401de1e9acc649e19" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and F300EXR.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR400 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02f91/02f91ba2508d1a8136cdf7a2ca252f511d60bba9" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c5f/80c5fea1f3af2ea043da5077840a05e49ca730da" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm F300EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR |
Also Known as | - | FinePix F305EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 215 grams (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $280 |