Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2013
FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and S200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") feature different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years after the S200EXR which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the S200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-ZR400 S200EXR 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013July 2009More modern by 43 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR400

 S200EXR EX-ZR400 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR

 EX-ZR400 S200EXR 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the FujiFilm S200EXR has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the S200EXR.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and S200EXR is 92 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and S200EXR.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR400 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will offer extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography highlights
FujiFilm S200EXR Portrait photography highlights
39
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
45
you can focus manually
provides face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography info
FujiFilm S200EXR Street photography info
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
45
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/1.6")
heavier than competition (865g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography details
FujiFilm S200EXR Sports photography details
57
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
great battery pack (500 per charge)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
34
incredible zoom range (31-436mm 14.1 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
max fps very slow (2.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
71
great battery pack (500 shots)
lighter than average (205g)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
38
flash built-in
great reach (436mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (865g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with FujiFilm S200EXR
52
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
great battery pack (500 shots)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
34
you can focus manually
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.6")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
FujiFilm S200EXR as a Vlogging camera
33
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (205 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of mic jack
19
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than competition (865 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
General Information
Make Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR
Also referred to as - FinePix S205EXR
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2013-01-29 2009-07-22
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine HS EXR
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.6"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 8 x 6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 48.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 31-436mm (14.1x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.3
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 7.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lb) 865 gr (1.91 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 NP-140
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $0 $500