Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and S200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") feature different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 3 years after the S200EXR which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the S200EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR400 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR400
S200EXR | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR
EX-ZR400 | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the FujiFilm S200EXR has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S200EXR in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the S200EXR.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and S200EXR is 92 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and S200EXR.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR400 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will offer extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
Also referred to as | - | FinePix S205EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | EXR |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 865 gr (1.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-140 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $500 |