Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffbde/ffbdefa3dbaa016a21238d3a965f28734e1b3ffe" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33743/337434d0283f067c28fe934446d977133d7ca5d2" alt="FujiFilm FinePix S2950 front FujiFilm FinePix S2950 front"
76 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix S2990
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S2950, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the S2950 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The EX-ZR400 was introduced 2 years after the S2950 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the FujiFilm S2950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the S2950 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm FinePix S2950. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and FujiFilm S2950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the FujiFilm S2950
EX-ZR400 | S2950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 26 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2950 over the Casio EX-ZR400
S2950 | EX-ZR400 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S2950
EX-ZR400 | S2950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the FujiFilm S2950 has specifications of 110mm x 73mm x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") having a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 and FujiFilm S2950 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the S2950.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2ab3/f2ab376a0d08ad7cfae538cb69c4549c540763ee" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and S2950 is 92 and 76 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e87a6/e87a60beb434511fd51952b3d941d121642d13d9" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The pic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and S2950.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer you extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 will have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41df9/41df933a2b60005850a8daf5636d7982297f7947" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07a12/07a12b052f28c1b4a76490f066f602678e2bc2fb" alt="Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR400 vs FujiFilm S2950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | FujiFilm FinePix S2950 |
Also Known as | - | FinePix S2990 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 97 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 437 gr (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $330 |