Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
61 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
Fujifilm S8200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S8200 (16MP) is pretty close and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured about the same time to the Fujifilm S8200 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S8200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the Fujifilm S8200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm FinePix S8200. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Fujifilm S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Fujifilm S8200
| EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8200 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| Fujifilm S8200 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm S8200
| EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm S8200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm S8200 has measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the Fujifilm S8200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm S8200 is 92 and 61 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and Fujifilm S8200.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you should expect comparable quality of images however you should consider the release date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography factors
Fujifilm S8200 Portrait photography factors
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography features
Fujifilm S8200 Street photography features
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than average in class (670g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography features
Fujifilm S8200 Sports photography features
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
good battery (500 shots)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (24-960mm 40.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Fujifilm S8200
good battery (500 shots)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (960mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (670g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S8200
has manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
good battery (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
Fujifilm S8200 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic port
heavier than average in class (670 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Fujifilm S8200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Fujifilm FinePix S8200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-960mm (40.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 0cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dot |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $450 |