Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak C135, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 13 months after the C135 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the C135 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Kodak C135
| EX-ZR400 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Clearer screen (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| C135 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak C135
| EX-ZR400 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and Kodak C135 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the C135.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and C135 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The picture below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and C135.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $0 |