Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Successor is Nikon A1000
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 4 years prior to the A900 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the A900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Nikon A900
EX-ZR400 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Casio EX-ZR400
A900 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | January 2013 | More recent by 37 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 461k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon A900
EX-ZR400 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Nikon A900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the A900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and A900 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through specifications. The visual here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and A900.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Nikon A900 to result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 289g (0.64 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $400 |