Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
67 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-855mm (F3.0-6.5) lens
- 538g - 114 x 89 x 96mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon L830
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Nikon L840, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the L840 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR400 was launched 24 months earlier than the L840 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Nikon L840 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the L840 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Nikon Coolpix L840. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Nikon L840 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Nikon L840
EX-ZR400 | L840 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon L840 over the Casio EX-ZR400
L840 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | January 2013 | More recent by 24 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon L840
EX-ZR400 | L840 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Nikon L840 has proportions of 114mm x 89mm x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") and a weight of 538 grams (1.19 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Nikon L840 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the L840.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and L840 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and L840.
All in all, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you should always consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon L840 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix L840 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix L840 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-855mm (37.2x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 7.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 538 grams (1.19 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 89 x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 590 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $400 |