Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
Nikon P950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Revealed January 2020
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon P950, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the P950 (16MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR400 was introduced 8 years earlier than the P950 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the P950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Nikon Coolpix P950. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Nikon P950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Nikon P950
| EX-ZR400 | P950 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| P950 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2020 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 84 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon P950
| EX-ZR400 | P950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon P950 has sizing of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") having a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon P950 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the P950.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and P950 is 92 and 52 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and P950.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect comparable quality of images but you have to factor the age of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR400 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
Nikon P950 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography features
Nikon P950 Street photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (1,005g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Sports photography with Nikon P950
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
good battery power (500 shots)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
great zoom range (24-2000mm 83.3 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography information
Nikon P950 Travel photography information
good battery power (500 shots)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
has bluetooth
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (2000mm)
more heavy than average in class (1,005g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Nikon P950 Landscape photography highlights
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good battery power (500 per charge)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3.2 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
Nikon P950 as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
relatively wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has external microphone jack
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than average in class (1,005 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon P950 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2020-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 90 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 1005g (2.22 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $0 | $797 |
