Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400/Casio-EX-ZR400-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S800c front Nikon Coolpix S800c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S800c/Nikon-S800c-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Launched February 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Nikon S800c, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the S800c (16MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR400 was manufactured at a similar time to the S800c so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the S800c for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Nikon Coolpix S800c. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Nikon S800c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Nikon S800c
EX-ZR400 | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Casio EX-ZR400
S800c | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 819k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+358k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon S800c
EX-ZR400 | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2013 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Nikon S800c has proportions of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Nikon S800c in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the S800c.
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and S800c is 92 and 93 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and S800c.
Plainly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures however you need to take the launch date of the products into consideration.
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR400-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S800c-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S800c Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix S800c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix S800c |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2013-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 819k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 184g (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 140 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $290 |