Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 216g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released April 2014

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the S810c (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was unveiled 14 months before the S810c which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the S810c in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Nikon Coolpix S810c. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Nikon S810c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Nikon S810c
EX-ZR400 | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S810c over the Casio EX-ZR400
S810c | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+768k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Nikon S810c
EX-ZR400 | S810c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon S810c has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the S810c.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and S810c is 92 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specs. The visual below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and S810c.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images although you would want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Nikon S810c Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix S810c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Nikon Coolpix S810c |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2014-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.7" |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 270 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL23 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $350 |