Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 3 years after the FE-5020 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the FE-5020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus FE-5020. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR400 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 43 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| FE-5020 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR400 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the FE-5020.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and FE-5020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The image below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and FE-5020.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to resolve extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Otherwise known as | - | X-935 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 137g (0.30 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $160 |