Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus SZ-10, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR400 was launched 2 years after the SZ-10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades against the SZ-10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus SZ-10. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus SZ-10
| EX-ZR400 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| SZ-10 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus SZ-10
| EX-ZR400 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 features external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-10 has specifications of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus SZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the SZ-10.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and SZ-10 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and SZ-10.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus SZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus SZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 215 gr (0.47 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |