Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is pretty similar and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was introduced 12 months earlier than the TG-850 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the TG-850 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
EX-ZR400 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400
TG-850 iHS | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
EX-ZR400 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 has outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the TG-850 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TG-850 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph below should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and TG-850 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you have to take the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 330 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $250 |