Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR400 was launched 13 months after the TG-320 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 TG-320 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2012Newer by 13 months
Manual focus  More precise focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kCrisper display (+231k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-ZR400

          

          

            
 TG-320 EX-ZR400 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-320

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch display  Neither features Touch display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the TG-320.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and TG-320.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

            Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography factors
39
 manual focus
 resolution is good (16MP)
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
33
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 supports face detect focus
 no manual focus
 manual mode not available
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
62
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (205g)
 no moving screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
66
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 weather sealing
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
 Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
57
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 fast shooting (30.0 fps)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 offers tracking autofocus
 good battery power (500 shots)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect autofocus
40
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 weather sealing
 painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
 lack of shutter priority mode
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 low battery (150 per charge)
 has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
71
 good battery power (500 per charge)
 lighter than average in class (205g)
 resolution is good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 great zoom (300mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 display isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
67
 lighter than others in class (155g)
 weather sealing
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 flash built-in
 really wide (28mm)
 does not have Timelapse function
 low battery (150 shots)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography features
52
 manual focus
 fairly wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (16 megapixels)
 good battery power (500 per charge)
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 does not have Timelapse recording
39
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (14MP)
 weather sealing
 no manual focus
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not available
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 low battery (150 CIPA)
 does not have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging advice
33
 fairly wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 does not have external microphone port
32
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 supports face detect focus
 lighter than others in class (155 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
 does not have microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-320
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Olympus TG-320
General Information
Brand Name Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2013-01-29 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS TruePic III+
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
Single AF    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch operation    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 205g (0.45 lbs) 155g (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 150 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $0