Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS

Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Olympus TG-630 iHS front
Portability
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced January 2013
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview

Following is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-ZR400 was introduced at a similar time to the TG-630 iHS and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR400 scores vs the TG-630 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 TG-630 iHS 
Manually focus  Very accurate focus
Display resolution461k460kCrisper display (+1k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400

          

          

            
 TG-630 iHS EX-ZR400 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-630 iHS

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 TG-630 iHS 
LaunchedJanuary 2013January 2013Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Absent Touch friendly display
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison

          

          

            
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the TG-630 iHS.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and TG-630 iHS is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Often, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to resolve extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.

            Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Photography Glossary        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-630 iHS Portrait photography info
39
 you can focus manually
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 cannot use external flash
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
27
 has face detection focus
 no manual focus
 no manual mode
 external flash not possible
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography highlights
62
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 fixed screen
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
62
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proofing
 screen is fixed
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Sports photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
57
 excellent zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 max frames per second high (30.0 frames per second)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 comes with tracking autofocus
 good battery pack (500 CIPA)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
34
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 has tracking autofocus
 environment proofing
 max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery life (220 shots)
 has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Travel photography factors
71
 good battery pack (500 shots)
 lighter than average in class (205g)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 flash built-in
 rather wide (24mm)
 long reach (300mm)
 no Timelapse function
 screen is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
59
 environment proofing
 built-in flash
 really wide (28mm)
 missing Timelapse function
 not so great battery life (220 shots)
 MP count low (12MP)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-630 iHS Landscape photography features
52
 you can focus manually
 rather wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 good battery pack (500 per charge)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW format
 no Timelapse function
39
 really wide (28mm)
 decent sized screen (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proofing
 no manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
 no manual mode
 MP count low (12MP)
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 has no RAW format
 not so great battery life (220 CIPA)
 missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-630 iHS Vlogging details
33
 rather wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than average in class (205g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 no external microphone jack
33
 really wide (28mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 has face detection focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 missing external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Olympus TG-630 iHS
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Olympus TG-630 iHS
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Announced 2013-01-29 2013-01-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
AF continuous    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 30.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 205 grams (0.45 lbs) 167 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 220 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $0 $200