Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To CamerasThe EX-ZR400 was launched 12 months after the TG-820 iHS so they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the TG-820 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX-ZR400 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2012 | Newer by 12 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400
TG-820 iHS | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | 461k | Sharper display (+569k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX-ZR400 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and TG-820 iHS is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The picture here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and TG-820 iHS.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 220 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $500 |