Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus TG-830 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled around the same time to the TG-830 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| EX-ZR400 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TG-830 iHS | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| EX-ZR400 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has sizing of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the TG-830 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TG-830 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs although you will need to factor the release date of the products into consideration.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-830 iHS Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-830 iHS Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-830 iHS Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
better than average battery pack (500 shots)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Olympus TG-830 iHS
better than average battery pack (500 per charge)
lighter than competition (205g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
weather proof
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-830 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery pack (500 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-830 iHS Vlogging advice
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone port
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 214g (0.47 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $0 |