Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 5 months prior to the TG-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the TG-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-ZR400 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TG-2 iHS | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+149k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| EX-ZR400 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | June 2013 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the TG-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TG-2 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to give greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-2 iHS Portrait photography features
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
provides face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery life (500 CIPA)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
good battery life (350 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography factors
better than average battery life (500 per charge)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
no Timelapse function
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
good battery life (350 per charge)
environment sealing
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography details
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
better than average battery life (500 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse function
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
good battery life (350 per charge)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging features
Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging features
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
no microphone port
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $380 |