Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus VG-160, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR400 was announced 13 months later than the VG-160 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the VG-160 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus VG-160
| EX-ZR400 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| VG-160 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus VG-160
| EX-ZR400 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the VG-160.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and VG-160 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and VG-160.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to show greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 165 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $0 | $90 |
