Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR400 was launched 2 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the VR-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-ZR400 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| VR-330 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-ZR400 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the VR-330.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and VR-330 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and VR-330.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography details
great battery power (500 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography highlights
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
great battery power (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging advice
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing external microphone jack
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $220 |
