Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was introduced 2 months later than the XZ-2 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-ZR400 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR400
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-ZR400 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | December 2012 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The graphic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-ZR400 will resolve more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 340 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $450 |