Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX5, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was revealed 19 months later than the CX5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the CX5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh CX5
| EX-ZR400 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| CX5 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX5
| EX-ZR400 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh CX5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the CX5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and CX5 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and CX5.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR400 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX5 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
you can focus manually
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography info
Ricoh CX5 Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX5 as a Sports photography camera
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX5 Travel photography factors
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than competition (205g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography highlights
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 shots)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging details
Ricoh CX5 Vlogging details
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $399 |
