Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Revealed February 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-3 was revealed 11 years prior to the ZS200 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-3 scores against the ZS200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic ZS200
E-3 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-3
ZS200 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | February 2008 | More modern by 121 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic ZS200
E-3 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 provides physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 versus the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and ZS200 is 56 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The pic here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and ZS200.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-02-20 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $670 | $800 |