Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Revealed July 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX9V, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and HX9V (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and HX9V (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 18 months after the HX9V which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the HX9V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony HX9V
XZ-2 iHS | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | July 2011 | More modern by 18 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
HX9V | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX9V
XZ-2 iHS | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sony HX9V has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony HX9V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the HX9V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and HX9V is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and HX9V.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sony HX9V will provide you with extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $450 | $328 |