Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900

Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Ricoh G900 front
Portability
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh G900
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh G900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-ZR400 was launched 6 years prior to the G900 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the G900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh G900

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 G900 
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-ZR400

          

          

            
 G900 EX-ZR400 
LaunchedFebruary 2018January 2013More recent by 61 months
Screen resolution1040k461kClearer screen (+579k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh G900

          

          

            
 EX-ZR400 G900 
Manually focus  More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch screen  Neither comes with Touch screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the G900.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and G900 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and G900.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

            Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography features
Ricoh G900 Portrait photography features
39
 you can focus manually
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 cannot use external flash
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
45
 manual focus
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 includes face detection autofocus
 no manual exposure
 no external flash support
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography information
Ricoh G900 Street photography information
62
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
60
 built in image stabilization (Digital)
 environment proof
 fixed screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 heavier than competition in class (247 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Sports photography camera
 Ricoh G900 as a Sports photography camera
57
 excellent zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 fast continuous shooting (30.0 frames per second)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 provides tracking focus
 good battery power (500 CIPA)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
54
 built in image stabilization (Digital)
 decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
 includes tracking autofocus
 environment proof
 great battery (340 shots)
 no shutter priority
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography info
Ricoh G900 Travel photography info
71
 good battery power (500 per charge)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 long zoom (300mm)
 no Time Lapse function
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
70
 great battery (340 shots)
 environment proof
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 built-in flash
 pretty wide (28mm)
 heavier than competition in class (247g)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography info
Ricoh G900 Landscape photography info
52
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen size is decent (3")
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count decent (16MP)
 good battery power (500 per charge)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
 very small sensor (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW support
 no Time Lapse function
56
 manual focus
 pretty wide (28mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Digital)
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 environment proof
 great battery (340 shots)
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 no manual exposure
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging factors
Ricoh G900 Vlogging factors
33
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 no mic support
32
 pretty wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Digital)
 includes face detection autofocus
 high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 lack of external mic jack
 heavier than competition in class (247g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh G900
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Ricoh G900
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Ricoh G900
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2013-01-29 2018-02-21
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3 and  3:2
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 461k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 30.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 5.50 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Flash on, flash off
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 3840x2160
Max video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Supports FlashAir SD cards
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lbs) 247 gr (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 340 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $752