Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43


89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh G900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR400 was launched 6 years prior to the G900 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the G900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh G900
EX-ZR400 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-ZR400
G900 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 61 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh G900
EX-ZR400 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the G900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and G900 is 92 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and G900.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-ZR400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh G900 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $752 |