Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Portability
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty close but the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 2 months prior to the GR and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR400 matches up against the GR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GR
| EX-ZR400 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-ZR400
| GR | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GR
| EX-ZR400 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | April 2013 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the GR.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and GR is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and GR.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR400 has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GR Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Sports photography highlights
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
max frames per second low (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery power (500 shots)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
focusing manually
screen is a good size (3")
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
missing microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 300 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 290 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $971 |
