Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR400 was manufactured 17 months after the GR Digital IV making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR400 scores versus the GR Digital IV when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-ZR400 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | September 2011 | More modern by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-ZR400
GR Digital IV | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 461k | Crisper display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-ZR400 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 vs the GR Digital IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and GR Digital IV.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR400 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZR400 will give you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR400 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 390 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $599 |