Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced January 2013
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Here is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is very similar but the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR400 was revealed 13 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 EX-ZR400 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2012Fresher by 13 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-ZR400

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 EX-ZR400 
Display resolution920k461kSharper display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 EX-ZR400 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 92 and 69 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same MP but different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 has the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field more challenging. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Portrait photography camera
39
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
74
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
55
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than average (550 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography factors
57
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high max fps (30.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery pack (500 shots)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
48
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Travel photography camera
71
great battery pack (500 shots)
lighter than competitors (205g)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
heavier than average (550g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography features
52
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
great battery pack (500 per charge)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
63
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR400
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (205g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic socket
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
features face detection focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic socket
heavier than average (550g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2013-01-29 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shutter rate 30.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 grams (0.45 pounds) 550 grams (1.21 pounds)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots 400 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $0 $871