Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is very similar but the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR400 was revealed 13 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR400 matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-ZR400 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-ZR400
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-ZR400 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 has exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 92 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The visual below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR400 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same MP but different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 has the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field more challenging. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter rate | 30.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 550 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 400 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $871 |