Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
51
Features
37
Overall
45

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released January 2013
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Introduced September 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR400 was launched 2 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR400 scores against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 EX-ZR400 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
IntroducedJanuary 2013September 2010Newer by 29 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-ZR400

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 EX-ZR400 
Display resolution920k461kSharper display (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 EX-ZR400 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR400 has got outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR400 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 92 and 88 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The pic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR400 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR400 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR400 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR400 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography factors
39
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
57
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (12MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
70
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (140 grams)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography highlights
57
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
fast shooting (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
good battery (500 shots)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
31
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
71
good battery (500 shots)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
no Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
58
lighter than competition in class (140g)
built-in flash
terrible battery (320 per charge)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
52
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse recording
47
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (320 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging factors
33
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no microphone port
28
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (140g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2013-01-29 2010-09-21
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine HS GR Engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting rate 30.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 pounds) 140 gr (0.31 pounds)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 320 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-130 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $566