Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR400 was unveiled 19 months later than the GXR Mount A12 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR400 grades against the GXR Mount A12 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-ZR400 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2011 | Fresher by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-ZR400
GXR Mount A12 | EX-ZR400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-ZR400 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the GXR Mount A12.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR400 and GXR Mount A12 is 92 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The graphic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-ZR400 will deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/9000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lbs) | 370g (0.82 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $349 |