Clicky

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-ZR400 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-ZR400 was manufactured 2 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR400 grades vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-ZR400 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedJanuary 2013March 2010Fresher by 35 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-ZR400

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-ZR400 
Screen resolution920k461kCrisper screen (+459k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-ZR400 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Focus manually  Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Missing Touch friendly screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR400 provides physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR400 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 92 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Oftentimes, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR400 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR400 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR400 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
	
			Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography factors
39
 focusing manually
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 external flash not possible
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
36
 you can focus manually
 exports RAW files
 does not have liveview
 low resolution (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
62
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competitors (205 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lighter than average (355g)
 screen is fixed
 small sensor (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
57
 long zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 high max fps (30.0 fps)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (16MP)
 has tracking autofocus
 good battery life (500 CIPA)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect auto focus
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
 low resolution (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
 has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
71
 good battery life (500 per charge)
 lighter than competitors (205g)
 MP count good (16MP)
 has built in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 long zoom (300mm)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
60
 lighter than average (355g)
 built-in flash
 relatively wide (24mm)
 low resolution (10MP)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
52
 focusing manually
 fairly wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 MP count good (16 megapixels)
 good battery life (500 per charge)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 sensor  is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW support
 missing Time Lapse mode
47
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 exports RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 low resolution (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR400 as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
33
 fairly wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than competitors (205 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 does not posses selfie friendly display
 missing external mic support
28
 relatively wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average (355g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
 missing external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR400Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2013-01-29 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 30.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.70 m 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lbs) 355 gr (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images 410 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $349